Simpsons Spitzname „The Juice“ (‚Saft') kommt von der Abkürzung seiner Vornamen O. J. = Orange Juice. Sein Spitzname gilt aber auch als Synonym für. Der Mordfall O. J. Simpson - ein Jahrhundert-Prozess in der Geschichte der USA. Verletzung an O.J. Simpsons linkem Mittelfinger, Juni Juni - OJ Simpsons «filmreife» Verhaftung vor dem Jahrhundertprozess. Der ehemalige US-Footballstar wurde am Juni verhaftet.
Hat O.J. Simpson in diesem Interview den Mord an seiner Ex-Frau gestanden?Juni wurden O.J. Simpsons Ex-Frau Nicole Brown und ihr Freund Ronald Goldman mit mehreren Messerstichen getötet. O.J. Simpson. Orenthal James Simpson ist ein ehemaliger US-amerikanischer American-Football-Spieler und Schauspieler. Weltweite Aufmerksamkeit erlangte Simpson auch durch den Verdacht, seine Exfrau Nicole Brown Simpson und deren Bekannten Ronald Goldman. Thema O.J. Simpson bei der FAZ ▷ Lesen Sie hier alle Nachrichten der FAZ Just, als den Hinterbliebenen die Rechte an O. J. Simpsons Werk zugesprochen.
Oj Simpsons Navigointivalikko VideoThe Shocking Case Of O.J. Simpson
Dawn French The actress said the tribute scenes to Alice Tinker, played by Chambers, were incredibly difficult to complete.
Katie Price Katie Price recently said that her son Harvey needs to shed some of his 29 stone weight or else he'll 'end up dead'.
Ariana Grande For pop star Ariana Grande, money was clearly no object when it came to finding the perfect gift for Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom's newborn.
Coronation Street The former Coronation Street star, 41, shared the shocking video on social media as her visit to see her year-old dementia-stricken gran quickly took a left turn.
Khloe Kardashian Khloe Kardashian took her daughter True, two, to donate toys at their local fire station to make her tot realise how 'fortunate' she is as Christmas grows closer during the pandemic.
Liz Hurley Liz Hurley has shared her enjoyment of working on TV show The Royals with a couple of throwback pics from the set in which she wears lacy underwear for her character.
Most Read Most Recent. The Queen Patricia Earl, the Queen's head housekeeper at Sandringham in Norfolk, was "embarrassed" after some servants refused to form a four-week bubble that would allow the monarch and Prince Philip to spend Christmas at the estate, it is claimed.
Cristiano Ronaldo Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi faced off for potentially the final time in their illustrious careers on Tuesday night, with the Portuguese.
Man's warning over Paw Patrol advent calendar leaves people in stitches Advent calendars The popular Christmas advent calendar featuring the famous characters in Paw Patrol went viral after one man's hilarious warning was shared across social media.
La juge Cecil J. L'accusation en demande une centaine et les obtient [ c 7 ]. Simpson [ nyt 7 ] , [ note 6 ].
Connu sous son surnom The Juice , il a toujours eu une bonne relation avec son voisinage et la police. Dure et stricte, elle renvoie une image d'intransigeance [ c 10 ].
Figure de l'accusation, Marcia Clark ne connait pas O. Simpson avant l'affaire, ni en tant que sportif, ni en tant qu'acteur [ t 27 ].
Howard L. Weitzman est l'avocat historique d'O. Simpson depuis les poursuites judiciaires pour violences conjugales du 1 er janvier Simpson de changer d'avocat [ t 59 ].
Shapiro est un brillant avocat de Los Angeles, ami des stars et familier d' Hollywood [ lib 4 ]. Shapiro contacte son ami F. Imaginant pouvoir plaider la folie , Shapiro demande au psychiatre Saul Fearstein d'examiner Simpson le 15 juin et de lui prescrire un traitement [ t 60 ].
Le D r William C. Simpson [ 11 ]. Ils prennent leurs repas ensemble [ t 67 ]. Dans la petite salle d'audience du juge Lance Ito , qui ne compte que quatre rangs de bancs pour les spectateurs, les deux camps se font face de part et d'autre [ t 72 ].
Simpson est dans sa maison. Simpson par le policier Mark Fuhrman [ 14 ]. Elle commence par raconter un incident survenu en , mais Johnnie Cochran objecte et obtient gain de cause face aux arguments de Christopher Darden [ t 78 ].
L'accusation poursuit et Denise Brown tente d'enfoncer O. Simpson, l'une des preuves les plus importantes de l'accusation. Lee Bailey qui attaque frontalement l'agent de police [ t 81 ].
Alors que l'interrogatoire de Rubin se conclut, un assistant entre dans la cour avec une paire de gants neuve [ t 85 ]. Simpson [ 12 ].
Elle permet aux Trojans de se qualifier pour le Rose Bowl pour y disputer la finale nationale contre les Hoosiers de l'Indiana. Avant la saison , Simpson aborde un nouveau style avec un style afro et une moustache [ 7 ].
La saison est encore pire pour les Bills qui ne remportent d'un seul match [ 6 ]. Simpson [ 6 ]. Simpson sur le terrain.
Lors de la rencontre suivante, le coureur se blesse aux deux genoux contre les Dolphins de Miami [ 12 ]. Individuellement, O.
En , O. Le 24 mars , O. Il est casanier. Superstitieux, il continue de porter les chaussettes blanches de sa rencontre record contre les Patriots de la Nouvelle-Angleterre en [ 6 ].
Alors que Jim Brown dominait ses adversaires par sa puissance, les forces d'O. Simpson on kirjoittanut kohukirjan If I did it Kirjassaan hän kertoo, miten hän olisi murhannut vaimonsa ja tämän ystävän, jos hän olisi sen tehnyt.
Vuonna liittovaltion tuomari siirsi kirjan oikeudet Goldmanin perheelle. Kirja julkaistiin nimellä If I did it: Confessions of the Killer , ja siihen lisättiin perheen kommentteja.
Simpsonin puretun kodin pihalle haudattuna löytyi vuonna mahdollisesti veren tahrima veitsi, ja LAPD alkoi tutkia sen mahdollisia DNA-jälkiä vuonna Tutkimuksissa kuitenkin paljastui, että veitsi ei liittynyt murhiin.
Simpson pidätettiin Tapaus sattui hotellissa Las Vegasissa , jossa Simpson tapasi urheilumuistoesineitä kauppaavia henkilöitä. Simpson ryösti esineet ystäviensä kanssa aseella uhaten, mutta väitti sitten, että kyse ei ollut ryöstöstä, koska esineet kuuluivat alun perin hänelle.
Yksi hotellihuoneessa ollut henkilö julkaisi internetissä ryöstön aikana nauhoitetun ääninauhan, jolla Simpsonin kuullaan raivoavan ja kiroilevan.
Oikeudenkäynnin piti alkaa Nevadan tuomioistuimessa 7. Oikeus tuomitsi Simpsonin 5. Hänelle annettiin mahdollisuus anoa ehdonalaiseen vapauteen aikaisimmillaan vuonna Heinäkuussa , yhdeksän vuoden vankeuden jälkeen, ehdonalaislautakunta Nevadassa hyväksyi Simpsonin ehdonalaisanomuksen.
Simpson O. Simpson vuonna Henkilötiedot Syntynyt 9. Pääartikkeli: O. Although the prosecution could not prove that Simpson owned a pair of those shoes, Bodziak testified that a similar bloody shoe print was left on the floor inside Simpson's Bronco.
Scheck suggested that Fuhrman broke into the Bronco and left the footprint there; he produced a photo of Fuhrman walking through a puddle of blood.
Bodziak admitted that he was not able to confirm that the shoe print in the car definitely came from a Bruno Magli shoe, but dismissed Scheck's claim because none of the shoe prints at the crime scene were made by Fuhrman's shoes, making it unlikely he could have made a bloody shoe print in the Bronco.
Simpson hired a team of high-profile defense lawyers, initially led by Robert Shapiro , who was previously a civil lawyer known for settling, and then subsequently by Johnnie Cochran, who at that point was known for police brutality and civil rights cases.
Assisting Cochran were Carl E. Douglas and Shawn Holley. The defense team's reasonable doubt theory was summarized as "compromised, contaminated, corrupted" in opening statements.
Robert Huizenga testified on July 14,  that Simpson was not physically capable of carrying out the murders due to chronic arthritis and old football injuries.
During cross-examination, the prosecution produced an exercise video that Simpson made a few weeks before the murders titled O.
Simpson Minimum Maintenance: Fitness for Men , which demonstrated that Simpson was anything but frail. Huizenga admitted afterwards that Simpson could have committed the murders if he was in "the throes of an adrenaline rush.
Michael Baden , a forensic pathologist, testified on August 10,  and claimed the murders happened closer to pm, which is when Simpson has an alibi.
After the trial, Baden admitted his claim of Goldman's long struggle was inaccurate   and that testifying for Simpson was a mistake. Gerdes admitted  that Goldman's blood was in Simpson's Bronco  despite Goldman never having an opportunity within his lifetime to be in the Bronco.
Barry Scheck and Peter Neufeld argued that the results from the DNA testing were not reliable because the police were "sloppy" in collecting and preserving it from the crime scene.
The prosecution denied that the mistakes made by Fung and Mazzola changed the validity of the results. The contamination claim was made by microbiologist Dr.
John Gerdes. It is chronic in the sense that it doesn't go away. During cross-examination, Dr. Gerdes admitted there was no evidence that cross-contamination had occurred and that he was only testifying to "what might have occurred and not what actually did occur".
He accepted that the victims' blood was in the Bronco and Simpson's blood was at the crime scene and neither was due to contamination.
He also conceded that nothing happened during "packaging and shipping" that would affect the validity of the results at the two consulting labs. The prosecution implied that Gerdes was not a credible witness: he had no forensic experience and had only testified for criminal defendants in the past and always said the DNA evidence against them was not reliable due to contamination.
Clark also implied that it was not a coincidence that the three evidence items he initially said were valid were the same three the defense claimed were planted while the other 58 were all false positives and the 47 substrate controls, which are used to determine if contamination occurred, were all false negatives.
Henry Lee testified on August 24, and admitted that Gerdes's claim was "highly improbable". Barry Scheck's eight-day cross-examination of Dennis Fung was lauded in the media.
What contamination and degradation will lead you to is an inconclusive result. It doesn't lead you to a false positive.
The defense initially only claimed that three exhibits were planted by the police  but eventually argued that virtually all of the blood evidence against Simpson was planted in a police conspiracy.
In closing arguments, Cochran called Fuhrman and Vannatter "twins of deception"  and told the jury to remember Vannatter as "the man who carried the blood"  and Fuhrman as "the man who found the glove.
The only physical evidence offered by the defense that the police tried to frame Simpson was the allegation that two of the DNA evidence samples tested in the case contained the preservative Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid , or EDTA.
Ironically, it was the prosecution who asked to have the samples tested for the preservative, not the defense.
In order to support the claim, the defense pointed to the presence of EDTA , a preservative found in the purple-topped collection tubes used for police reference vials, in the samples.
On July 24, , Dr. Fredric Rieders , a forensic toxicologist who had analysed results provided by FBI special agent Roger Martz, testified that the level of EDTA in the evidence samples was higher than that which is normally found in blood: this appeared to support the claim they came from the reference vials.
Rieders to read out loud the portion of the EPA article that stated what the normal levels of EDTA in blood are, which he referenced during his testimony.
Rieders then claimed it was a "typo"   but the prosecution produced a direct copy from the EPA disproving that claim.
Rieders the day before. When the defense accused their own witness of changing his demeanor to favor the prosecution, he replied "I cannot be entirely truthful by only giving 'yes' and 'no' answers".
Martz also tested his own unpreserved blood and got the same results for EDTA levels as the evidence samples, which he said conclusively disproved the claim the evidence blood came from the reference vials.
The defense alleged that Simpson's blood on the back gate at the Bundy crime scene was planted by the police.
The blood on the back gate was collected on July 3, , rather than June 13, the day after the murders. The volume of DNA was so high that the defense conceded that it could not be explained by contamination in the lab, yet noted that it was unusual for that blood to have more DNA on it than the other samples collected at the crime scene, especially since it had been left exposed to the elements for several weeks and after the crime scene had supposedly been washed over.
On March 20, Detective Vannatter testified that he instructed Fung to collect the blood on the gate on June 13 and Fung admitted he had not done so.
The prosecution responded by showing that a different photograph showed that the blood was present on the back gate on June 13 and before the blood had been taken from Simpson's arm.
Barry Scheck alleged the police had twice planted the victims' blood inside Simpson's Bronco. An initial collection was made on June 13; the defense accused Vannatter of planting the victims' blood in the Bronco when he returned to Simpson's home later that evening.
The prosecution responded that the Bronco had already been impounded by the time Vannatter returned and was not even at Rockingham. The defense alleged that the police had planted Brown's blood on the socks found in Simpson's bedroom.
The socks were collected on June 13 and had blood from both Simpson and Brown, but her blood on the socks was not identified until August 4. He had received both blood reference vials from the victims earlier that day from the coroner and booked them immediately into evidence.
Vannatter then drove back to Rockingham later that evening to hand deliver the reference vial for Simpson to Fung, which the defense alleged gave him opportunity to plant the blood.
Fung testified he could not see blood on the socks he collected from Simpson's bedroom  but the prosecution later demonstrated that those blood stains are only visible underneath a microscope.
Detective Vannatter denied planting Nicole Brown's blood on the socks. The video from Willie Ford indicated that the socks had already been collected and stored in the evidence van before Vannatter arrived and footage from the media cameras present appeared to prove that he never went inside the evidence van when he arrived at Rockingham.
The last exhibit allegedly planted was the bloody glove found at Simpson's property by Detective Mark Fuhrman.
Robert Shapiro later admitted he was Toobin's source. Defense attorney F. Lee Bailey suggested that Fuhrman found the glove at the crime scene, picked it up with a stick and placed it in a plastic bag, and then concealed it in his sock when he drove to Simpson's home with Detectives Lange, Vannatter and Philips.
Bailey suggested that he then planted the glove in order to frame Simpson, with the motive either being racism or a desire to become the hero in a high-profile case.
The prosecution denied that Fuhrman planted the glove. They noted that several officers had already combed over the crime scene for almost two hours before Fuhrman arrived and none had noticed a second glove at the scene.
Detective Lange testified that 14 other officers were there when Fuhrman arrived and all said there was only one glove at the crime scene.
Frank Spangler also testified that he was with Fuhrman for the duration of his time there and stated he would have seen Fuhrman purloin the glove if he had in fact done so.
Clark added that Fuhrman did not know whether Simpson had an alibi, if there were any witnesses to the murders, whose blood was on the glove, that the Bronco belonged to Simpson, or whether Kaelin had already searched the area where the glove was found.
During cross-examination by Bailey,  Fuhrman denied that he had used the word "nigger" to describe African Americans in the ten years prior to his testimony.
The tapes were made between and by screenwriter named Laura Hart McKinny, who had interviewed Fuhrman at length for a Hollywood screenplay she was writing on women police officers.
The Fuhrman tapes became the cornerstone of the defense's case that Fuhrman's testimony lacked credibility.
Clark called the tapes "the biggest red herring there ever was. After McKinny was forced to hand over the tapes to the defense, Fuhrman says he asked the prosecution for a redirect to explain the context of those tapes but the prosecution and his fellow police officers abandoned him after Ito played the audiotapes in open court for the public to hear.
Fuhrman says he instantly became a pariah. On September 6, , Fuhrman was called back to the witness stand by the defense, after the prosecution refused to redirect him, to answer more questions.
The jury was absent but the exchange was televised. Fuhrman, with his lawyer standing by his side and facing the possibility of being charged with Perjury , was instructed by his attorney to invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid self-incrimination to two consecutive questions he was asked.
Defense attorney Uelmen asked Fuhrman if it was his intention to plead the Fifth to all questions, and Fuhrman's attorney instructed him to reply "yes".
Uelmen then briefly spoke with the other members of the defense and said he had just one more question: "Did you plant or manufacture any evidence in this case?
Cochran responded to Fuhrman's pleading the Fifth by accusing the other officers of being involved in a "cover-up" to protect Fuhrman and asked Judge Ito to suppress all of the evidence that Fuhrman found.
Ito denied the request, stating that pleading the fifth does not imply guilt and there was no evidence of fraud.
Cochran then asked that the jury be allowed to hear Fuhrman taking the fifth and again Ito denied his request. Ito also criticized the defense's theory of how Fuhrman allegedly planted the glove stating "it would strain logic to believe that".
On June 15, , Christopher Darden surprised Marcia Clark by asking Simpson to try on the gloves found at the crime scene and his home.
The prosecution had earlier decided against asking Simpson to try them on because they had been soaked in blood from Simpson, Brown and Goldman,  and frozen and unfrozen several times.
Instead they presented a witness who testified that Nicole Brown had purchased a pair of those gloves in the same size in at Bloomingdales for Simpson along with a receipt and a photo during the trial of Simpson earlier wearing the same type of gloves.
The leather gloves appeared too tight for Simpson to put on easily, especially over the latex gloves he wore underneath. Clark claimed that Simpson was acting when he appeared to be struggling to put on the gloves, yet Cochran replied "I don't think he could act the size of his hands.
The prosecution stated they believed the gloves shrank from having been soaked in the blood of the victims. He stated "the gloves in the original condition would easily go onto the hand of someone of Mr.
Simpson's size. After the trial, Cochran revealed that Bailey had goaded Darden into asking Simpson to try on the gloves  and that Shapiro had told Simpson in advance how to give the appearance that they did not fit.
In closing arguments, Darden ridiculed the notion that police officers might have wanted to frame Simpson. Darden noted the police did not arrest Simpson for five days after the murders.
The prosecution told the jury in closing arguments that Fuhrman was a racist, but said that this should not detract from the factual evidence that showed Simpson's guilt.
Clark put emphasis on the physical evidence such as the DNA, the bronco and Simpson's lack of an alibi, while Darden referred to Simpson's relationship with Nicole as a "ticking time bomb" and spoke about how the police had refused to arrest Simpson until Nicole's death despite his physical abuse, stalking and death threats, and Nicole filling a safety deposit box with a will and photographs of previous beatings in case Simpson murdered her.
Cochran compared Fuhrman to Adolf Hitler and referred to him as "a genocidal racist, a perjurer, America's worst nightmare and the personification of evil", and claimed without proof that Fuhrman had single-handedly planted all of the evidence, including the gloves, in an attempt to frame Simpson for the murders based purely on his dislike of interracial couples.
Fears grew that race riots, similar to the riots in , would erupt across Los Angeles and the rest of the country if Simpson were convicted of the murders.
As a result, all Los Angeles police officers were put on hour shifts. The police arranged for more than police officers on horseback to surround the Los Angeles County courthouse on the day the verdict was announced, in case of rioting by the crowd.
President Bill Clinton was briefed on security measures if rioting occurred nationwide. The only testimony the jury reviewed was that of limo driver Park.
An estimated million people worldwide watched or listened to the verdict announcement. Water usage decreased as people avoided using bathrooms.
Supreme Court received a message on the verdict during oral arguments , with the justices quietly passing the note to each other while listening to the attorney's presentation.
Congressmen canceled press conferences, with one telling reporters, "Not only would you not be here, but I wouldn't be here, either. After the verdict in favor of Simpson, most blacks surveyed said they believed justice had been served, with most claiming that Simpson had been framed and some even suggesting that Mark Fuhrman was the actual killer.
In , FiveThirtyEight reported that most black people now think Simpson committed the murders. Shapiro admitted the defense played the race card, from the bottom of the deck.
It was followed by a three-hour tour of Simpson's estate. Simpson was under guard by several officers but did not wear handcuffs; he waited outside the crime scene in and around an unmarked police car and was permitted to enter his house.
Simpson's defense team had switched out his photos of whites for blacks, including switching a picture of a nude Paula Barbieri Simpson's girlfriend at the time, who was white for a Norman Rockwell painting from Cochran's office.
Prosecutors had requested that Ito restrict the tour to only the crime scene for this exact reason, but Ito refused, and came under heavy criticism for allowing the defense to control the trial.
Critics of the jury's not-guilty verdict contended that the deliberation time was unduly short relative to the length of the trial.
Some said that the jurors, most of whom did not have any college education, did not understand the forensic evidence.
Three jurors together wrote and published a book called Madam Foreman,  in which they described how their perception of police errors, not race, led to their verdict.
They said that they considered Darden to be a token black assigned to the case by the prosecutor's office.
In , Cochran wrote and published a book about the trial. It was titled Journey to Justice, and described his involvement in the case.
He criticized Bailey as a "loose cannon" and Cochran for bringing race into the trial. Clark published a book about the case titled Without a Doubt She concluded that nothing could have saved her case, given the defense's strategy of highlighting racial issues related to Simpson and the LAPD, and the predominance of blacks on the jury.
In Clark's opinion, the prosecution's factual evidence, particularly the DNA, should have easily convicted Simpson.
That it did not, she says, attests to a judicial system compromised by issues of race and celebrity. Darden published a book about the case called In Contempt He also describes his frustration with a "dysfunctional and uneducated jury" that dismissed Simpson's history of domestic violence as irrelevant and inability to comprehend the DNA evidence in the case.
Darden also describes his initial contact with Fuhrman and his suspicions that he is a racist and his feelings that the prosecution had been "kidnapped by a racist cop" whom they were unable to divorce themselves from.
It also details the candid factors behind Darden's controversial decision for Simpson to try on the infamous glove and the impact it had on the trial's outcome.
Simpson Got Away with Murder. He contended that the note "reeked" of guilt and that the jury should have been allowed to see it. He also noted that the jury was never informed about items found in the Bronco.
The prosecution said that they felt these items of evidence would bring up emotional issues on Simpson's part that could harm their case, despite the fact that the items seemed as though they could be used for fleeing.
Bugliosi also said the prosecutors should have gone into more detail about Simpson's domestic abuse and presented evidence contrary to the defense's assertion that Simpson was a leader in the black community.
Bugliosi also criticized the prosecution for trying the murder in Los Angeles, rather than Santa Monica, and described the prosecution's closing statements as inadequate.
California courts barred peremptory challenges to jurors based on race in People v. Wheeler ,  years before the U. Supreme Court would do so in Batson v.
Defense forensic DNA expert Dr. He devotes the last two chapters to explaining the arguments of Scheck and Neufeld against the DNA evidence in the Simpson case.
Lee notes that Scheck and Neufeld were skeptics of DNA evidence and only recently before the trial, in , accepted its validity and founded the Innocence Project.
Henry Lee or Dr. Edward Blake, considered Scheck and Neufeld's reasonable doubt theory about the blood evidence plausible.
In hindsight, Dr. Lee opines that Scheck and Neufeld's claim that "the blood evidence is only as good as the people collecting it" was an obfuscation tactic to conflate the validity of the evidence with the integrity of the LAPD and then attack the latter because both Scheck and Neufeld knew that the defense's forensic DNA experts reached the same conclusion as the prosecution: the mistakes made during evidence collection did not render the results unreliable.
He bases this on comments from jurors after the trial, some of which included claims that the blood at the crime scene that matched Simpson had "degraded" and could possibly have been from Simpson's children or from one of the officials who collected the evidence.
He attributes this misinterpretation to Scheck and Neufeld's deliberate obfuscation and deception about the reliability of the results.
After the trial, the jurors faced harsh criticism for doubting the DNA evidence while Scheck and Neufeld received praise. Lee believes that the scathing criticism the jurors faced for doubting the DNA evidence based on the arguments Scheck and Neufeld made might have been the reason why they were the only two DNA experts from the criminal trial to decline to return for the subsequent civil trial to make those claims again.
When the trial began, all of the networks were getting these hate-mail letters because people's soap operas were being interrupted for the Simpson trial.
But then what happened was the people who liked soap operas got addicted to the Simpson trial. And they got really upset when the Simpson trial was over, and people would come up to me on the street and say, 'God, I loved your show.
The murders and trial — "the biggest story I have ever seen", said a producer of NBC's Today — received extensive media coverage from the very beginning; at least one instant book was proposed two hours after the bodies were found, and scheduled to publish only a few weeks later.
The nightly news broadcasts from the Big Three television networks gave more air time to the case than to the Bosnian War and the Oklahoma City bombing combined.
Participants in the case received much media coverage. While Cochran, Bailey and Dershowitz were already well-known, others like Kaelin became celebrities, and Resnick and Simpson's girlfriend Paula Barbieri appeared in Playboy.
Those involved in the trial followed their own media coverage; when Larry King appeared in the courtroom after a meeting with Ito, both Simpson and Clark praised King's talk show.
Interest in the case was worldwide; Russian president Boris Yeltsin 's first question to President Clinton when they met in was, "Do you think O.
The issue of whether to allow any video cameras into the courtroom was among the first issues Judge Ito had to decide, ultimately ruling that live camera coverage was warranted.